Abstract

The strawberry is a popular fruit known for its color and flavor, but it is highly perishable due to its high respiration rate with rapid ripening and lack of natural protective covering. Existing packaging techniques for strawberries primarily focus on marketing purposes that often do not provide sufficient protection against mechanical and physiological damage. In this study, different packaging techniques were investigated, considering the cushioning and respiration needs of strawberries. The material and design of the packaging were optimized to enhance strawberry storage and preservation.  The effects of packaging material on strawberry weight loss and shelf life were investigated.  Two types of packaging were investigated at 4°C with a relative humidity ranging from 74% to 84% using two packaging materials in the form of egg-crate made of molded pulp or Styrofoam, which was compared to common clamshell packages made of polyethylene material. Different strawberry attributes were measured including firmness, color, mold, weight, taste and aroma.  Results showed that Styrofoam egg-crate packages had the least weight loss compared to molded pulp and control packages. The ventilation design had a significant effect within treatment but not between treatments. Sensory test results showed that Styrofoam packages had better attributes in terms of firmness, color, aroma, and overall acceptability compared to molded pulp. The packaging type had a significant effect on strawberry shelf life, while the ventilation location did not. The findings suggest that packaging materials play an important role in prolonging strawberry shelf life.

Full Text:

PDF

References

J. F. Hancock, “Worldwide strawberry industry.,” in Strawberries, CABI Wallingford UK, 2020, pp. 86–108.

H. Wang, G. Cao, and R. L. Prior, “Total Antioxidant Capacity of Fruits,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 701–705, Jan. 1996, doi: 10.1021/jf950579y.

B. R. Cordenunsi, M. I. Genovese, J. R. O. do Nascimento, N. M. A. Hassimotto, R. J. dos Santos, and F. M. Lajolo, “Effects of temperature on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of three strawberry cultivars,” Food chemistry, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 113–121, 2005.

USDA, “United States Standards for Grades of Strawberries,” 2006.

J. Błaszczyk et al., “The Effect of Harvest Date and Storage Conditions on the Quality of Remontant Strawberry Cultivars Grown in a Gutter System under Covers,” Agriculture, vol. 12, p. 1193, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/agriculture12081193.

G. Romanazzi and E. Feliziani, “Botrytis cinerea (gray mold),” in Postharvest decay, Elsevier, 2014, pp. 131–146.

M. R. Klimchuk and S. A. Krasovec, Packaging design: Successful product branding from concept to shelf. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

T. Karst, “The Packer,” Farm Journal, 2021.

K. Lewandowski and K. Skórczewska, “A Brief Review of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Recycling,” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 15. 2022. doi: 10.3390/polym14153035.

T. T. Nguyen, H. Huang, T. A. H. Nguyen, and S. Soda, “Recycling clamshell as substrate in lab-scale constructed wetlands for heavy metal removal from simulated acid mine drainage,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 165, pp. 950–958, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.026.

M. Didone et al., “Moulded Pulp Manufacturing: Overview and Prospects for the Process Technology,” Packaging Technology and Science, vol. 30, pp. 231–249, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1002/pts.2289.

K. Semple, C. Zhou, O. Rojas, nguegang nkeuwa William, and C. Dai, “Moulded pulp fibers for disposable food packaging: A state-of-the-art review,” Food Packaging and Shelf Life, vol. 33, p. 100908, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100908.

M. Debnath, R. Sarder, L. Pal, and M. Hubbe, “Molded pulp packaging review,” Bioresources, vol. 17, pp. 3810–3870, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.15376/biores.17.2.Debnath.

M. M. Giusti and R. E. Wrolstad, “Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV‐visible spectroscopy,” Current protocols in food analytical chemistry, no. 1, p. F1. 2.1-F1. 2.13, 2001.

G. Xiao, M. Zhang, G. Luo, J. Peng, V. M. Salokhe, and J. Guo, “Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the preservation of strawberry and the extension of its shelf-life,” International agrophysics, vol. 18, no. 2, 2004, Accessed: Feb. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-article-0f82d9e7-d146-4b4b-8ea3-7db16558d7a7

A. Panda, R. Goyal, A. Godara, and V. Sharma, “Effect of packaging materials on the shelf-life of strawberry cv. Sweet Charlie under room temperature storage,” Journal of Applied and Natural Science, vol. 8, pp. 1290–1294, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.31018/jans.v8i3.955.

L. Luoto, “STRAWBERRY QUALITY: EFFECTS OF HANDLING, PACKAGING AND STORAGE ON SHELF-LIFE,” in Acta Horticulturae, International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium, Jan. 1985, pp. 79–82. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1985.157.9.

C. Nicoletto, S. Bonato, S. Santagata, G. Zanin, and P. Sambo, “Effect of postharvest temperature and packaging on qualitative traits in strawberry,” Acta Horticulturae, pp. 303–310, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1120.46.

C. Cutter, “Microbial control by packaging: a review,” Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2002.

R. Muangrat and C. Nuankham, “Moisture sorption isotherm and changes in physico-mechanical properties of films produced from waste flour and their application on preservation quality of fresh strawberry.,” Food science & nutrition, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 585–593, May 2018, doi: 10.1002/fsn3.589.

L. Cisneros‐Zevallos, “The use of controlled postharvest abiotic stresses as a tool for enhancing the nutraceutical content and adding‐value of fresh fruits and vegetables,” Journal of food science, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1560–1565, 2003.

I. M. Taha et al., “Impact of Starch Coating Embedded with Silver Nanoparticles on Strawberry Storage Time.,” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 7, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/polym14071439

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46676/ij-fanres.v6i2.484